The famous English case of Rookes against Barnard concerned a closed shop agreement.  The alliances of the International Labour Organization do not deal with the legality of closed shop rules, so the question of each nation is left to the discretion of each nation.  The legal status of closed shop agreements varies considerably from country to country, ranging from prohibitions in the agreement to non-mention to comprehensive regulation of the agreement. A store closed before entry (or simply closed) is a form of union security agreement in which the employer agrees to hire only union members, and employees must remain members of the union at all times to remain employed. This is different from a business closed after entry (us: union store), which is an agreement that requires all employees to join the union if they are not already members.  In a union activity, the union must welcome as a member any person hired by the employer.  The Taft-Hartley Act also prohibits unions from charging excessive initiation fees as a precondition to membership, in order to prevent you from using initiatory fees as a means of driving non-unionized employees away from a given sector. In addition, the National Labor Relations Act allows employers to enter into pre-employment agreements in which they agree to source from a group of employees seconded by the union. The NLRA prohibits pre-lease agreements outside the construction industry.  The U.S. government does not allow union stores within a federal agency, whether or not state law permits. All forms of closed businesses in the Commonwealth are illegal under the Workplace Relations Act 1996. There was an attempt by the Howard government to change the definition of what constitutes a closed store, in accordance with the Labour Relations Amendment (More Jobs, More Pay) Bill 1999.
 However, the bill was later defeated.  The status of closed businesses varies from province to province within Canada. The Supreme Court held that section 2 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms guaranteed both the freedom not to connect, but that workers in a work environment largely dominated by a union were beneficiaries of union policy and would therefore have to pay union fees, regardless of affiliation status. However, religious objectors and war warguards were given the opportunity to donate the sum to a registered charity. The European Court of Human Rights held that Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights provided for a “negative right of association or, in other words, a right not to be compelled to join an association”, in Sørensen and Rasmussen against Denmark (2006). Therefore, the closed businesses referred to in Article 11 of the Convention are illegal. All forms of closed businesses in Britain are illegal after the introduction of the Employment Act in 1990. They were further restricted pursuant to section 137(1)(a) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (c. 52), then passed by the Conservative government.
. . .